Sunday, September 3, 2017

WE ARE AT WAR. HUSSEIN AND THE OLIGARCHS TRANSFORMED AMERICA

Hussein Obama DID Fundamentally Transform America in ways I could not have imagined 8 years ago.
Do you recognize this country anymore? The Races are a divided! The Minorities demand absurd things as reparations. The Muslims think they have a right to be here! The Hispanics think that America is theirs! The Illegal aliens think they have a right to take our stuff. The Fringes of society believe their sexual orientation demand more attention than that of the Majority Population and not just equal protection. The Minority populations have been emboldened to disparage the White Majority. Thugs with masks freely roam cities beating up Civilians. Police departments take their orders from Radical Politicians they are hired by and stand down from enforcing the law.  Yes the Nation has been Fundamentally Transformed.

AND WE LET IT HAPPEN RIGHT  UNDER OUR NOSES
JUST LIKE THE FROG:::


Hussein Obama transformed America for his Socialist Oligarch masters including George Soros. They WON culturally.. and that is usually the first step to the destruction of a Nation.  Donald Trump won with the last vestiges of a Judeo Christian Society standing besides him as the last stand. If Trump loses the battle America is LOST. Its that dark!

Trump could turn back the Oligarch charge. It takes time and they do not want to give him any time. That is why we are witnessing an unprecedented all-out war against OUR LEGALLY ELECTED PRESIDENT


Since President Trump’s inauguration, the headlines are all about leftist groups forcing Democratic Party politicians to adopt their strategy of “Resist!” and claiming President Trump is a threat to the country.

Believe your eyes:  women in pink pussy hats led by a jihadi-supporting Muslim in a hijab, and youths in black masks attacking Trump supporters with clubs, are precisely what they look like – ideologues and extremists.

So where did all these agitators come from?  From the moment he entered the Oval Office, Obama with the help of George Soros and the Socialist oligarch men behind the curtain in America and other parts of the World staffed up. The DOJ was  co-opted and the Deep State Bureaucrats in the EPA and Department of Education, and began to target blacks, conservationists, and millennials with his leftwing, divisive messages.  Enormous sums of money were lavished on radical groups and agendas.

As Paul Sperry tells us in an important New York Post article, Obama’s private foundation, Organizing for Action, directly churned out community organizers by the tens of thousands. 

When former President Barack Obama said he was “heartened” by anti-Trump protests, he was sending a message of approval to his troops. Troops? Yes, Obama has an army of agitators — numbering more than 30,000 — who will fight his Republican successor at every turn of his historic presidency. And Obama will command them from a bunker less than two miles from the White House.
Significantly, Obama handed his famous state of the art election campaign – the data, the staff, the fundraising – to Organizing for Action, not to the Democratic Party.  Eight years later, the Democratic Party is decimated at every level of government.  And they are being overrun by professional agitators. 
From the moment he took over the Oval office, Obama’s efforts were much bigger than the OFA’s direct training. 

According to Hans von Spakowsky and Christian Adams, two attorneys who previously worked in the Civil Rights Division …every single one of the hundreds of lawyers hired during the Obama Administration—every single one—was a leftwing activist. “The Obama Justice Department,” they wrote, “has assembled a law firm of hundreds of fringe leftists to enforce a brave new vision of civil rights law.
Through the DOJ, President Obama instituted a shakedown system eerily reminiscent of the Acorn “Muscle for Money” program that he was a part of in Chicago. But as president, he could do it to the tune of half a billion, yes that’s a billion, dollars. 

 From Kimberly Strassel:

The Justice Department prosecutes cases against supposed corporate bad actors. Those companies agree to settlements that include financial penalties. Then Justice mandates that at least some of that penalty money be paid in the form of “donations” to nonprofits that supposedly aid consumers and bolster neighborhoods….surprise, surprise: … The National Council of La Raza. The National Urban League. The National Community Reinvestment Coalition. NeighborWorks America (which awards grants to left-leaning community organization groups, and has been compared with Acorn).
We are talking about very large sums of money, to very radical groups.

This strategy kicked off with the $13 billion J.P. Morgan settlement … That changed with the Citigroup and Bank of America settlements, which outright required $150 million in donations. The BofA agreement contains a provision that potentially tees up nonprofit groups for another $490 million. …To further induce companies to go the donation route, Justice considers these handouts to be worth “double credit” against penalty obligations. So … a $500,000 donation by BofA to La Raza takes at least $1 million off the company’s bill.
Did you ever wonder what happened to make our millennials so authoritarian, with campus culture suddenly against freedom of religion, thought and speech?  How did it happen?  President Obama at work.  He used the federal purse and Title IX to unleash feminist and black radicals on college campuses across America, insisting our colleges were hotbeds of racism and rape. 

The DOJ’s Civil Rights Division forced campuses to staff up with full time Title IX enforcers or face prosecution.  From AEI:

In her essay “The Dean of Sexual Assault” Ms. Williams documents how she went from being “Dean of Students” for several decades to being forced into the role of “Dean of Sexual Assault” in recent years because of misguided pressure from the Office of Civil Rights and the Obama administration ….
There are 150 full time staff at Berkeley alone, in their Division of Equity and Inclusion, with a budget of $20 million.  Departments like this across the country provide jobs for radicals, and train more radicals.  Eight years under Obama, of training in white privilege and guilt, and you have a generation of politically correct millennials who police themselves and each other, through hive mind thinking and bullying.
Young people were also the target of a program called White House Champion of Change, which Obama used, for example,  to push the cause of campus rape, and promote a jihadi activist in America.
Then there was the radicalization of the black community.  The DOJ was the prime instrument in Obama’s purposeful stoking of racial fear and hate for political gain.  Instead of providing jobs to black communities, Obama lectured the country about America’s historic guilt and the injustice of rich people having more money than poor people.   Obama abandoned the Democratic Party’s traditional focus on spoils and affirmative action, to support the Blacks Lives Matter War on Cops.  More suffering for blacks, more radicalization.

The Obama-Holder-Lynch Justice Department has been on the front lines of the left’s campaign to vilify law enforcement and to promote radical anti-police organizations such as Black Lives Matter and Al Sharpton’s National Action Network. Over the past eight years, the Department has initiated investigations into 23 local police departments for civil rights violations … Baltimore, Ferguson, Missouri, and Chicago. In such cases, wide-ranging complaints are filed against a department, …allowing the Justice Department to in essence direct the day to day activities of the police force, mandating the Obama leftwing social agenda on local jurisdictions.
Wonder why you can’t even chill out with some sports or celebrity TV these days, without getting a dose of leftist agitprop?  All those celebrity fundraisers and parties at the White House had a political arm, with Obama calling on entertainers and sports figures to promote his political agenda. 

…used Obama’s prestige to recruit  “leaders from politics, business, tech, sports, media, and entertainment to create a digital storm across an array of social media” to back Obama’s  amnesty for illegal immigrants.
President Trump was elected by America’s salt of the earth heartland and common sense working class.  That’s who we’re supposed to think are Hitlerites.



The hysteria against Trump arises from precisely those groups targeted, agitated and trained by none other than our previous President, Obama, Agitator-in-Chief.

WE ARE AT WAR PATRIOTS.. A WAR FOR AMERICA. THEY ARE WORKING TO CONTINUE THE TRANSFORMATION.

WE MUST FIGHT BACK NOW..

From NCR
Did Barack Obama fundamentally transform the United States of America, as he promised?
The answer is absolutely Yes.
That fundamental transformation, however, has not happened in areas where many might have hoped (or feared) in 2008. It has not been a fundamental shift in the attitudes of the vast majority regarding the role of government, taxation, regulations, economics, education or even health care, where Obama had his signature legislative achievement. It hasn’t happened in foreign policy, though Obama has made a seriously detrimental impact in regions from Eastern Europe to the Middle East.
The reality is that the true fundamental transformation has been in the realm of culture, notably in matters of sexual orientation, marriage and family. The shift there has been unprecedented and far beyond anyone’s imagination eight years ago.
Looking back, I think that was where Obama’s heart was, and that was where his deepest impact will be felt. Changes there, more than anywhere, seem irreversible by anything other than the miraculous, than anything short of a religious revival or dramatic shift in spiritual-moral thinking.
Obama’s cultural revolution on the sexual-gender-family front is all around us.
We see it in the culture of fear and intimidation by the forces of “diversity” and “tolerance” who viciously seek to denounce, dehumanize, demonize and destroy anyone who disagrees with their brazen newfound conceptions of marriage and family, even as our position (not theirs) has been the prevailing position of 99.99% of human beings who have bestrode the earth since the dawn of humanity.
Instead, in the Obama era, we are the ones portrayed as the outliers, as abnormal, as extremists, as “haters.” If you dissent from this new vociferous breed of human-nature redefiners, they sue you, they jail you, they smear you, they boycott you, they harass you, they ruin you — and they do so (with no sense of their hypocrisy) in the name of “tolerance” and “diversity.”
Whether you’re a Baptist grandma who bakes cakes or a Catholic photographer who takes wedding photos or a Mormon florist who arranges flowers, they refuse your appeals to your conscience; they steamroll you. Changes by Obama and his allies here have constituted a major attack on religious liberty, where 200-year-old First Amendment guarantees have been torched by modern culture warriors discerning heretofore unknown higher rights like “marriage equality” and co-ed toilets.
That is a fundamental transformation of a culture and a nation that did not exist prior to Barack Obama’s ascent.
The manifestations of this are so ubiquitous that laying them out here isn’t necessary, but I’d like to offer just a handful of brief illustrations and images:
The first was the Newsweek cover from May 2012 showing Barack Obama with a rainbow halo over his head above the words, “The First Gay President.” This was in response to Obama coming out for same-sex “marriage,” which for five years he had claimed to oppose. This public shift occurred as Obama was ramping up his re-election campaign, just as Hillary Clinton would do later that year when she announced her 2016 campaign.
After that announcement, Obama employed an aggressive agenda of fundamental transformation on the sexual-gender-family front, one that picked up speed, depth and arrogance throughout his second term.
The second is another image, more profound than the Newsweek creation/coronation because it was real. It was from June 2015, when the Obama White House, the nation’s first house, was lit up in the colors of the “LGBTQ” rainbow on the day of the Obergefell v. Hodges decision, when a Catholic Supreme Court justice, Anthony Kennedy, led the liberal bloc of the court in redefining marriage and imposing this nonexistent “constitutional right” on all 50 states. If ever there was a picture of Obama’s fundamental transformation of America, that was it.
Third was the bathroom fiat, when, according to Obama’s word, all public schools were ordered to revolutionize their restrooms and locker rooms to make them available to teenage boys who want to be called girls (among other gender novelties).
It is hard to conceive a more surreal example of executive overreach.
Truly, George Washington is rolling over in his grave.
Fourth is an ironic moment of Obama’s own doing, one that got virtually no press coverage. It occurred at a town-hall meeting in London last April, where Obama was scolded by a young man for not doing enough to “recognize non-binary people” such as himself. This young man wanted the British government to “respect pronouns” — using not words like “he” or “she,” but rather “hir” or “ze” — in addition to “commit to gender-neutral toilets.”
“I really, really wish that yourself and [British Prime Minister] David Cameron would take us seriously as transgender people,” pushed the student. “And perhaps you could elucidate as to what you can do to go beyond what has been accepted as the LGBTQ rights movement, in including people who fit outside the social norms.”
It was almost hilarious to observe Barack Obama, of all people, reprimanded for inadequacies in this area, which brings me to my final example.
That London incident might have prompted a remarkable action by the Obama White House a few weeks later, which also got virtually no news coverage: The White House Press Office released two extraordinary fact sheets detailing Obama’s vast efforts to promote “LGBT” rights at home and abroad. Not only was it telling that the White House would assemble such a list, and tout it, but the sheer length of the list is striking to behold. It is hard to find any similar roster of such dramatic changes by the Obama White House in any policy area. The list runs page after page.
In short, what we see here is the true Barack Obama legacy, the genuine fundamental transformation.
It has occurred not in economics, government, or foreign policy, but in culture.
When we look back at Barack Obama’s eight years, we should visualize not Obamacare or something in foreign policy, but that White House illuminated in rainbow colors on June 26, 2015, or a rainbow-haloed Obama celebrated as the “first gay president.”

Tuesday, August 8, 2017

Obama lied and Obama spied starting in 2011

EXPOSED: THE WORST OFFENSE OF A SECRETIVE THUG ADMINISTRATION. NOW ALL OF IT MAKES SENSE. BLACKMAIL!

First lets cut the crap and call it what it is. 

"Unmasking" in simple terms is "SPYING".

 


Why Justice Roberts switched his vote. Why Angela Merkel became the Pro Islamic German leader she is. Why Pope Benedict suddenly retired. Why John Boehner sided with Obama and suddenly retired. Why Romney Ryan were always one step behind in the 2012 elections. Why the Republicans were always exposed and why Key Conservatives like John McCain and Lindsay Graham switched sides in the fight. They had all their dirty little secrets!

BLACK MAIL IS A POWERFUL TOOL USED BY SPYMASTERS AROUND THE GLOBE.

The National Security Agency under former President Barack Obama routinely violated American privacy protections while scouring through overseas intercepts and failed to disclose the extent of the problems until the final days before Donald Trump was elected president last fall, according to once top-secret documents that chronicle some of the most serious constitutional abuses to date by the U.S. intelligence community. 

More than 5 percent, or one out of every 20 searches seeking upstream Internet data on Americans inside the NSA’s so-called Section 702 database violated the safeguards Obama and his intelligence chiefs vowed to follow in 2011, according to one classified internal report reviewed by Circa.

The Obama administration self-disclosed the problems at a closed-door hearing Oct. 26 before the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court that set off alarm. Trump was elected less than two weeks later.

The normally supportive court censured administration officials, saying the failure to disclose the extent of the violations earlier amounted to an “institutional lack of candor” and that the improper searches constituted a “very serious Fourth Amendment issue,” according to a recently unsealed court document dated April 26, 2017.

The admitted violations undercut one of the primary defenses that the intelligence community and Obama officials have used in recent weeks to justify their snooping into incidental NSA intercepts about Americans.

Circa has reported that there was a three-fold increase in NSA data searches about Americans and a rise in the unmasking of U.S. person’s identities in intelligence reports after Obama loosened the privacy rules in 2011.

Officials like former National Security Adviser Susan Rice have argued their activities were legal under the so-called minimization rule changes Obama made, and that the intelligence agencies were strictly monitored to avoid abuses.

The intelligence court and the NSA’s own internal watchdog found that not to be true.
The American Civil Liberties Union said the newly disclosed violations are some of the most serious to ever be documented and strongly call into question the U.S. intelligence community’s ability to police itself and safeguard American’s privacy as guaranteed by the Constitution’s Fourth Amendment protections against unlawful search and seizure.


Yes ...

Obama Intel agency secretly conducted illegal searches on Americans for years.

For what you have to ask yourself. Not because it could.. but because they had a plan. To STEAL AMERICA! No other answer will make sense! You can see the results.

The National Security Agency under former President Barack Obama routinely violated American privacy protections while scouring through overseas intercepts and failed to disclose the extent of the problems until the final days before Donald Trump was elected president last fall, according to once top-secret documents that chronicle some of the most serious constitutional abuses to date by the U.S. intelligence community.

More than 5 percent, or one out of every 20 searches seeking upstream Internet data on Americans inside the NSA’s so-called Section 702 database violated the safeguards Obama and his intelligence chiefs vowed to follow in 2011, according to one classified internal report reviewed by Circa.

The Obama administration self-disclosed the problems at a closed-door hearing Oct. 26 before the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court that set off alarm. Trump was elected less than two weeks later.
The normally supportive court censured administration officials, saying the failure to disclose the extent of the violations earlier amounted to an “institutional lack of candor” and that the improper searches constituted a “very serious Fourth Amendment issue,” according to a recently unsealed court document dated April 26, 2017.
The admitted violations undercut one of the primary defenses that the intelligence community and Obama officials have used in recent weeks to justify their snooping into incidental NSA intercepts about Americans.

Circa has reported that there was a three-fold increase in NSA data searches about Americans and a rise in the unmasking of U.S. person’s identities in intelligence reports after Obama loosened the privacy rules in 2011.
Officials like former National Security Adviser Susan Rice have argued their activities were legal under the so-called minimization rule changes Obama made, and that the intelligence agencies were strictly monitored to avoid abuses.

The intelligence court and the NSA’s own internal watchdog found that not to be true.

“Since 2011, NSA’s minimization procedures have prohibited use of U.S.-person identifiers to query the results of upstream Internet collections under Section 702,” the unsealed court ruling declared. “The Oct. 26, 2016 notice informed the court that NSA analysts had been conducting such queries in violation of that prohibition, with much greater frequency than had been previously disclosed to the Court.”

Speaking Wednesday on Fox News, Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) said there was an apparent effort under the Obama Administration to increase the number of unmaskings of Americans.

"If we determine this to be true, this is an enormous abuse of power," Paul said. “This will dwarf all other stories.”

“There are hundreds and hundreds of people,” Paul added.


The American Civil Liberties Union said the newly disclosed violations are some of the most serious to ever be documented and strongly call into question the U.S. intelligence community’s ability to police itself and safeguard American’s privacy as guaranteed by the Constitution’s Fourth Amendment protections against unlawful search and seizure.

“I think what this emphasizes is the shocking lack of oversight of these programs,” said Neema Singh Guliani, the ACLU’s legislative counsel in Washington. 
“You have these problems going on for years that only come to the attention of the court late in the game and then it takes additional years to change its practices.
“I think it does call into question all those defenses that we kept hearing, that we always have a robust oversight structure and we have culture of adherence to privacy standards,” she added. “And the headline now is they actually haven’t been in compliance for years and the FISA court itself says in its opinion is that the NSA suffers from a culture of a lack of candor.”
The NSA acknowledged it self-disclosed the mass violations to the court last fall and that in April it took the extraordinary step of suspending the type of searches that were violating the rules, even deleting prior collected data on Americans to avoid any further violations.
“NSA will no longer collect certain internet communications that merely mention a foreign intelligence target,” the agency said in the statement that was dated April 28 and placed on its Web site without capturing much media or congressional attention.
In question is the collection of what is known as upstream “about data”about an American that is collected even though they were not directly in contact with a foreigner that the NSA was legally allowed to intercept.
The NSA said it doesn't have the ability to stop collecting ‘about’ information on Americans, “without losing some other important data. ” It, however, said it would stop the practice to “reduce the chance that it would acquire communication of U.S. persons or others who are not in direct contact with a foreign intelligence target.”
The NSA said it also plans to “delete the vast majority of its upstream internet data to further protect the privacy of U.S. person communications.”

Agency officials called the violations “inadvertent compliance lapses.” But the court and IG documents suggest the NSA had not developed a technological way to comply with the rules they had submitted to the court in 2011.

Officials "explained that NSA query compliance is largely maintained through a series of manual checks" and had not "included the proper limiters" to prevent unlawful searches, the NSA internal watchdog reported in a top secret report in January that was just declassified. A new system is being developed now, officials said.
The NSA conducts thousand of searches a year on data involving Americans and the actual numbers of violations were redacted from the documents Circa reviewed.
But a chart in the report showed there three types of violations, the most frequent being 5.2 percent of the time when NSA Section 702 upstream data on U.S. persons was searched.
The inspector general also found  noncompliance between 0.7 percent and 1.4 percent of the time involving NSA activities in which there was a court order to target an American for spying  but the rules were still not followed. Those activities are known as Section 702 and Section 705 spying.







The IG report spared few words for the NSA’s efforts before the disclosure to ensure it was complying with practices, some that date to rules issued in 2008 in the final days of the Bush administration and others that Obama put into effect in 2011.

“We found that the Agency controls for monitoring query compliance have not been completely developed,” the inspector general reported, citing problems ranging from missing requirements for documentation to the failure to complete controls that would ensure “query compliance.”
The NSA’s Signal Intelligence Directorate, the nation’s main foreign surveillance arm, wrote a letter back to the IG saying it agreed with the findings and that “corrective action plans” are in the works.

NOW YOU KNOW...

DO NOT LET SOME FOOLISH TALKING HEAD SWAY YOUR UNDERSTANDING. WE ARE LIVING IN A POLICE STATE IF THE TRUMP JUSTICE DEPARTMENT DOES NOT PROSECUTE AND HANG THE PERPETRATORS!

Monday, August 7, 2017

Loretta Lynch As Attorney General used a Bogus email name JUST LIKE OBAMA!

JUST LIKE OBAMA AND SO MANY OTHERS IN THE LAST 8 YEARS OF CRIME AND FRAUD AND CHICANERY... and like her predecessor, Eric Holder, former Attorney General and like her Boss Barack Hussein Obama who all use FAKE emails to hide their crimes, Loretta Lynch used an email alias to conduct government business to cover her tracks on making sure Hillary Clinton was protected from Indictment from crimes tied to her own crookedness.


Call the Justice Department Phone 202 514 2000 Ext. 4 and tell them to Investigate NOW!.


Several of Lynch’s emails were included in 413 pages of DOJ documents provided to the conservative groups Judicial Watch and the American Center for Law and Justice. Both groups had filed lawsuits for records regarding Lynch’s controversial meeting with President Bill Clinton at the Phoenix airport last June 27.
Using the pseudonym “Elizabeth Carlisle,” Lynch corresponded with DOJ press officials to hammer out talking points in response to media requests about the meeting. She wanted to be sure to cover her tracks and minimize the impact by working with lackeys in the press corp at the NY Times and the Washington post and alphabet Networks.

The tarmac was exposed by a lone reporter on the ground and  rightfully encountered criticism from conservatives because Lynch was overseeing the federal investigation into whether Hillary Clinton mishandled classified information on her private email system.

The meeting was revealed not by Lynch in her testimony, Clinton, the FBI under James Comey or the Justice Department but by a reporter in Phoenix working based on a tip.

On June 28, a reporter with Phoenix’s ABC News affiliate contacted the Justice Department to inquire about the meeting. Internal DOJ emails show that the request touched off a mad-dash to develop talking points and statements to respond to the developing story.
Just remember that Loretta Lynch is supposed to be the top Law enforcement Officer in the land.. and she is up to her eyeballs in CRIME to COVER UP Hillary's Crimes. Bought and Paid for based on Idelogy and Skin Color. Lynch, using the Elizabeth Carlisle account, which was hosted on the Justice Department’s system, was involved in directing those discussions.
Crooks cover their tracks in the hope they do not get caught. Eric Holder hiding information to protect Obama used the alias “Lew Alcindor” — the birth name of NBA legend Kareem Abdul-Jabbar — as his email handle until he left DOJ in 2015.
The Carlisle emails were discovered over the weekend by followers of Reddit accounts that support President Trump. Some users developed the theory that Lynch used her grandmother’s name as a her pseudonym. Others concluded that Lynch broke the law by using a pseudonym, though it is not illegal for government officials to do so unless they do it in the interpreting or covering up of a CRIME.

In one email, sent just minutes after ABC News inquired about the tarmac meeting, Melanie Newman, the director of DOJ’s public affairs office at the time, wrote an email to the Elizabeth Carlisle account that she addressed to “AG Lynch.” 

This shows that the Alphabet Networks were partners in the crime since they already knew the Loretta Lynch secret email address.
Lynch responded later in the day to Newman and other DOJ officials.
“Thanks to all who worked on this,” reads the reply, which was ended with the initials “AG.”
Using the Carlisle account, Lynch was involved in several other email exchanges discussing drafts of talking points regarding her interaction with Clinton. We are certain that these were not the only times she used this email. She has used this email to direct payers of bribes and kickbacks to certain secret accounts in payment for her roles in the various schemes cooked up by the Clinton Gang. Nobody does illegal things for FREE!!
On June 29, Newman sent an email to the account — again with a greeting for “AG Lynch” — containing TV clips of news coverage of the airport encounter.
Lynch then went on to lie and downplay her meeting with Clinton, even though it had significant influence on the Clinton email probe. This is the Obstruction of Justice that the new Trump Justice Department must investigate!

The laws in this country were not written for the Citizen and excluded the Political connected and the Law Enforcers.
 

Lynch lied then that the former president boarded her airplane uninvited and spoke for about 30 minutes with her and her husband. She said that the conversation centered on grandchildren and other mundane issues like golf. Another lie.  She has insisted that the Hillary Clinton email investigation was not discussed. Another lie. Heads must roll for such abuses of power and lying!
Cornered Lynch reluctantly relinquished control over the email investigation after acknowledging that the meeting could be interpreted in a negative light. ( Yeah Right!!) Then she passed the baton onto another crook. He was instructed what was to be said and done to cover for Hillary.
FBI Director James Comey stepped in to oversee the investigation, which came to an end on July 5 when he gave a press conference announcing that charges would not be filed against Clinton. This was all part of the crooked dealings of the past administration.

Though Comey said that there was not enough evidence to prosecute the former secretary of state, he criticized her carelessness in using a private email account to send and receive classified information.

Other Obama administration officials have been caught using email aliases.
Tarmac Meeting
Another bombshell revealed in ACLJ’s release concerns several of the emails obtained address the secretive “tarmac” meeting between Bill Clinton and Loretta Lynch, which happened right around the time the Obama administration began issuing FOIA requests to unmask the Trump team.
Per ACLJ:

One with the subject line “FLAG”was correspondence between FBI officials (Richard Quinn, FBI Media/Investigative Publicity, and Michael Kortan) and DOJ officials concerning “flag[ing] a story . . . about a casual, unscheduled meeting between former president Bill Clinton and the AG.” The DOJ official instructs the FBI to “let me know if you get any questions about this” and provides “[o]ur talkers [DOJ talking points] on this”. The talking points, however are redacted.

Another email to the FBI contains the subject line “security details coordinate between Loretta Lynch/Bill Clinton?”

On July 1, 2016 – just days before our FOIA request – a DOJ email chain under the subject line, “FBI just called,” indicates that the “FBI . . . is looking for guidance” in responding to media inquiries about news reports that the FBI had prevented the press from taking pictures of the Clinton Lynch meeting. The discussion then went off email to several phone calls (of which we are not able to obtain records). An hour later, Carolyn Pokomy of the Office of the Attorney General stated, “I will let Rybicki know.” Jim Rybicki was the Chief of Staff and Senior Counselor to FBI Director Jim Comey. The information that was to be provided to Rybicki is redacted.
Lynch had previously said that the tarmac meeting was ‘unscheduled’ described as an ‘ambush’ by former President Bill Clinton, and that she ‘wouldn’t do it again.’ The ACLJ’s document dump suggests otherwise, as the FBI and DOJ scrambled to do damage control.

It has been exposed that crooks and Cohorts in the schemes tied to the Obama cabal all used phony names and aliases to cover their illegal acts.

AND THEN THERE IS THE PERJURY=> Loretta Lynch LIED UNDER OATH – She Told Trey Gowdy She Only Uses Official Email (Video) A Black Face Lie since we now expose the truth.
AG Loretta Lynch told Rep. Trey Gowdy (R-SC) under oath that she only uses official email in November 2016 — after these above emails were sent.

Watch the video . and ask yourself. HOW DARE THE TRUMP JUSTICE DEPARTMENT LOOK THE OTHER WAY?



 Former IRS official Lois Lerner, who targeted conservative non-profit groups seeking tax-exempt status, occasionally used the alias “Toby Miles” to send and receive work emails.
Lisa Jackson, the former administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, infamously used the alias “Richard Windsor” to conduct work business and yes Head Crook Barack Hussein Obama used a phony email ON THE CLINTON SERVER to conduct his extortion and kick back schemes while lying to the people through CBS 60 Minutes that he knew nothing about the Clinton Server until it was brought up in the press. YES. HE LIED... WHILE  HE WAS CONDUCTING HIS ILLEGAL MONEY SCHEMES. THIS IS THE LEVEL OF ILLEGAL ACTIVITIES IN THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION.

So my question to you all is ..."If they are allowed to get away with it.. who do you blame?" 

My Answer.. " Blame us ALL"

If we do not demand justice in this society and get it.. we are no better off than Venezuela or Cuba. Only that our facade is prettier and more clean!

If the Trump Justice Department looks the other way and chase low hanging fruit like MS 13 and illegal aliens while the bigger crooks reside in their mansions comfortable in the knowledge that they will not be touched... THEN WE HAVE LOST THE REPUBLIC!

ACT NOW..  CALL THE TRUMP JUSTICE DEPARTMENT AND DEMAND INVESTIGATIONS AND SUBPOENA'S.

Not through Congress that is a TOOTHLESS TIGER with no power to Indict.. BUT THROUGH THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT!

Call the Justice Department Phone 202 514 2000 Ext. 4 and tell them to Investigate NOW!.

More Info on Loretta Lynch and Hillary Connections: http://john-gaultier.blogspot.com/2016/11/loretta-lynch-is-protecting-hillary.html


More info on Obama using fake email address

http://john-gaultier.blogspot.com/2016/10/obama-used-fake-name-on-clinton-server.html

Friday, August 4, 2017

How House & Senate Defrauded America to get out of Obamacare

How Congress ( 100 Senators and 540 Congressmen + their staff) Fraudulently claimed to be a ‘Small Business’ to Qualify for Obamacare Subsidies while the rest of us were screwed!



This scandal shows that the SWAMP has both Republicans and Democrats.Obama presided over this FRAUD as a bribe to get them to pass this FRAUD!

Read and SHARE how key administration and Congressional officials connived to create, under cover of Obamacare, special health insurance subsidies just for members of Congress. CROOKS & LIARS.

So now you know why they are in no hurry to REPEAL OBAMACARE. THEY HAVE A GOOD THING GOING!

DONALD TRUMP CAN STOP THIS FRAUD BY EXECUTIVE ORDER AND MAKE THEM FEEL THE PAIN TOO!

Here’s  the blow by blow in this scam

Rushing to enact the giant Obamacare bill in March 2010, Congress voted itself out of its own employer-sponsored health insurance coverage—the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program (FEHBP).
Section 1312(d)(3)(D) required members of Congress and staff to enroll in the new health insurance exchange system. But in pulling out of the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program, they also cut themselves off from their employer-based insurance contributions.

(It should be noted that, before final passage, Sen. Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, offered an amendment that would have provided Federal Employees Health Benefits Program subsidies for congressional enrollees in Obamacare, but Senate Democrats defeated it on a procedural vote, 56-43.)

Obamacare’s insurance subsidies for ordinary Americans are generous, but capped by income. No one with an annual income over $47,080 gets a subsidy. That’s well below typical Capitol Hill salaries. Members of Congress make $174,000 annually, and many on their staff have impressive, upper-middle-class paychecks.


So, let’s follow the thickening plot:
Act One—Congress Has a Panic Attack
Realizing what they had done, Congressional leaders sought desperately to get fatter taxpayer subsidies in the Obamacare exchange system. In a nutshell, they wanted special funding unavailable to other Americans. The standard excuse was that, without a special “sweetener,” a Capitol Hill “brain drain” would ensue; the best and brightest would flee to the private sector to get more affordable employment-based coverage.

From 2010 to 2013, House and Senate leaders schemed to get extra taxpayer subsidies—past “the Tea Party rabble”—without a lot of noise, and secure a nice, quiet “administrative” remedy from the Obama administration.

Their hopes centered on a compliant Office of Personnel Management (OPM), the agency that administers the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program, providing the unauthorized relief. No recorded votes. No ugly floor fights.

Act Two—Congress Gets Taxpayers’ Money Without Appropriating It 

Anticipating an attempted “end run” around the law, on August 2, 2013, the Heritage Foundation published a detailed paper outlining the legislative history of the controversy. The analysis concluded that neither the Affordable Care Act nor Chapter 89 of Title V (the law governing the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program) authorized the transfer of monies in the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program trust fund for use in health plans outside of the program.

Shortly thereafter, on August 13, 2013, Timothy Jost, professor of law at Washington and Lee University, wrote in his Health Affairs Blog:
“The exchanges are only open to individuals and small employers. No large employers can participate in the exchange, at least not yet. There is no provision, therefore for large employers, including the largest—the United States government—to pay for exchange coverage.
“Digging into the role of former House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid,D-Nev., on Oct. 1, 2013, Politico reported, ‘OPM initially ruled that lawmakers and staffers couldn’t receive the subsidies once they went into the exchanges.’”

But, at a July 31 closed-door meeting with Senate Democrats, President Obama had promised he would “fix” the mess they made of their health coverage.

So, on August 7, 2013, just as Congress was getting out of town for the August recess, OPM ruled that members of Congress and staff enrolled in the exchange program would get Federal Employees Health Benefits Program subsidies, even though they were no longer in the program.

Act Three—Congress Magically Becomes a "Small Business" with under 50 employees.

In a second iteration of its rule-making, OPM declared that Congress and staff were eligible to enroll in the Washington D.C. “SHOP” Exchange, a health insurance exchange reserved for small businesses with fewer than 50 employees. The exchange offers special insurance subsidies to participating small businesses.

The problem was, of course, that Congress is not a “small business,” at least under any clinically sane definition of the term, and no section of the Affordable Care Act provided for any congressional exemption from the ban on large-employer participation in the SHOP exchanges. It’s hard to imagine a more arbitrary ruling.

Act Four—Congressional Bureaucrats File False Paperwork
In filing to get the special insurance subsidies for enrolling lawmakers and their staff members in the D.C. “SHOP” Exchange , congressional officials claimed that the Senate and House each had only 45 employees. That false information allowed both chambers to meet the magic number requirement.

In Feb. 2015, Sen. David Vitter, R-La., a member of the Senate’s Small Business and Entrepreneurship Committee, attempted to subpoena these un-redacted documents, only to be stymied by all nine Committee Democrats and five Republicans.

According to National Review, Sen.Vitter’s effort was opposed by the Senate leadership. As for the five Committee Republicans, they alibied their votes with excuses that ranged from the merely lame to the transparently absurd.

Now the issue is simmering again. This month, Michael Cannon of the CATO Institute and John Malcolm, director of The Heritage Foundation’s Meese Center for Legal and Judicial Studies, wrote in The Hill:
“Documents obtained under the Freedom of Information Act show that unnamed officials who administer benefits for Congress made clearly false statements when they applied to have the House and Senate participate in D.C.’s ‘SHOP’ Exchange for 2014. Notably, they claimed the 435 member House had only 45 members and 45 staffers, while the 100-member Senate had only 45 employees total. Rather than a good faith clerical error, this was an intentional falsehood, which makes it a crime under both federal and D.C. law.”CROOKS! THEY ARE ALL CROOKS! 

http://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/d-c-government-concedes-law-not-allow-congress-obtain-obamacare-small-business-exchange/


Monday, July 31, 2017

Facebook Censorship goes too far. This is considered against "Community Standards!"

Hey Mark Zuckerberg..

This is Facebook censorship.


WHAT THE HELL DOES THIS NOT CONFORM TO YOUR STUPID COMMUNITY STANDARDS.

I posted this video on Facebook with this comment!

See Below.


John Gaultier
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣You got to watch this. Just imagine The Big Kid as Trump and the little punk kid as the Lefty Media including CNN. :-) PUT A GIF ON THIS SOMEONE! Facebook hiding the share button ... AGAIN ?? Click here to share! https://www.facebook.com/TPFAR/videos/vb.100002702173010/1131418106958251/?type=2&theater At some point you fight back and KICK ASS to teach them a lesson. DONALD TRUMP IS DOING JUST THAT !! SHARE AND FEEL RIGHTEOUS.. YA GOT TO FIGHT BACK PEOPLE! 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Your Company has blocked me for 30 days for THIS.

     THIS IS INSANE! THIS IS CENSORSHIP


I HOPE OTHERS WILL SHARE THIS ON ZUCKERBERGS TWITTER FEED EVERY 10 Minutes

 
@finked

and on his facebook page
https://www.facebook.com/zuck


THIS MONOPOLY MEDIA MUST BE CURTAILED.
 

Sunday, July 2, 2017

The LEFTY ANTI TRUMP Rats Investigating The Russia Lie? They are the Trojan Horse Infiltrators of America!



  SO How did Jeff Sessions mess up this badly ? Mueller, Rosenstein, and Comey are enemy Combatants for the Socialist Cabal.

These people are part of a web of Anti -Trump America gang of front men.

It also tells you why Washington DC needs to be dismantles and made into a Tourist Destination and not the den of Thieves it is today.


There is a longtime and incestuous relationship between the fixers who have been tasked with taking down President Trump, under the fake narrative of enforcing the law.  James Comey worked in the DOJ directly under Mueller until 2005. Rod Rosenstein and Mueller go even further back.

James Comey wasn’t just some associate of Mueller back then, but rather his protégé.  Under the George W. Bush presidency, when Comey was serving as Deputy Attorney General under John Ashcroft, Robert Mueller was Comey’s go-to guy when he needed help.  The two men, as it came to light years later, conspired to disobey potential White House orders to leave Ashcroft alone when he was incapacitated in March of 2004.  These two men, when together, will not obey orders if they think they know better.  Being filled with hubris and almost two decades of doing just about anything they want, they always think they know better.

Rod Rosenstein, current Deputy Attorney General under Attorney General Jeff Sessions, is also a member of the Mueller Gang, having worked directly under Robert Mueller at the Department of Justice as far back as 1990. 

When Comey was still working as the Deputy Chief of the Criminal Division for the U.S. Attorney’s office in New York, Mueller and Rosenstein were becoming thick as thieves.


We look back at Rod’s loyal work for Hillary Clinton, when he became a clean-up man for the Clinton Administration as an Associate Independent Counsel from 1995 until 1997. He supervised the investigation that found no basis for criminal prosecution of White House officials who had obtained classified FBI background reports. He did a great job covering for the Team Bill Clinton, including covering for Hillary, as she was one of the people who had access to the reports, and may have even requested them. Convenient for the Clintons, no indictments were filed.

Having proven his loyalty to the powers that be, Rosenstein was appointed to work in the US Office of the Independent Counsel under Ken Starr on the Whitewater Investigation into then President Bill Clinton. By some miracle, or clever work by insiders, the Clintons escaped culpability once again.  Rod wasn’t alone, he had help from his co-worker James Comey, who was also making sure the Clintons were exonerated during the Whitewater affair.

Here is Robert Mueller, sitting in the middle of his two wunderkinds, making sure the path before them is smooth and obstacle free, and practically shepherding their careers along the way. 

So is it any wonder that once Jeff Sessions shamelessly recused himself from the Russia Collusion Conspiracy investigation and turned it over to his deputy Rod Rosenstein, that Rosenstein would reach out to his old mentor for help?  Who is surprised when three of the top lawman fixers for the Clinton/Bush cabal have axes in their eyes for President Donald J. Trump?


Enter Lisa Barsoomian, wife of Rod Rosenstein.  Lisa is a high-powered attorney in Washington, DC, who specializes in opposing Freedom of Information Act requests on behalf of the Deep State, err, I mean, the Intelligence Communities.
 

Check out her Law License Status!! 

State
StatusAcquiredUpdated
NJ                                     Resigned Without Prejudice 199403/25/2017
Lisa Barsoomian works for R. Craig Lawrence, an attorney who has represented

1) Robert Mueller three times,
2) James Comey five times, 

3) Barack Obama forty-five times,
4) Kathleen Sebellius fifty-six times,
5) Bill Clinton forty times, 

6) Hillary Clinton seventeen times between 1991 and 2017.


R. CRAIG LAWRENCE

Assistant United States Attorney

Special Department of Justice Attorney

U.S. Attorney’s Office

Judiciary Center Building

555 4th  Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20530

Telephone: (202) 514-7159

Fax: (202) 514-8780

Email: craig.lawrence@usdoj.gov

Barsoomian participated in some of this work personally and has herself represented the FBI at least five separate times.  It would be great to research the specifics of the cases she worked in, many of the documents from the Court Docket relating to these cases have been removed from the D.C. District and Appeals Court, including her representation for Clinton in 1998’s case Hamburg. V. Clinton.
Her loyalties are clearly with the entities that make up the Deep State, as are her husbands.

They are a DC Globalist Power Couple, and they mean to destroy Donald Trump under the bidding of their Globalist Masters. 

Rod Rosenstein should not have any position in President Trump’s administration, let alone one with so much power to harm the Office of the Presidency.


Mueller is also a Deep State lackey, even acting as delivery boy for Hillary’s State Department, hand transporting ten grams of highly enriched uranium under the auspices of counter-terror. It must only be coincidence that this happened at the same time as Hillary and her henchman John Podesta were nurturing the Uranium One deal that would see Russia take control over 20% of America’s proven uranium reserves.  Shortly after the Russia uranium deal closed, the Clinton Foundation was showered with many millions of dollars from Russian donors.

Comey, Rosenstein, and their patron Mueller are truly the Swamp Rats of the Deep State.  Joined long ago in mutual regard, owing allegiance only to each other and the enshrined bureaucracy that created them.  As their actions show, they desire to thwart the will of the people and depose the duly elected President of the United States of America by using all the powers at their disposal.

WAKE UP JEFF SESSIONS.. Stand by Donald Trump or stand down and let a Fighter like Rudy Giuliani Take your place.

This passive approach only emboldens the enemies of America. We have but one chance to RESTORE AMERICA... DO NOT BLOW IT THROUGH PASSIVE INACTION

Friday, June 30, 2017

WHY DONALD TRUMP MUST USE TWITTER & FACEBOOK TO REACH "WE THE PEOPLE"

WHY DONALD TRUMP MUST USE TWITTER & FACEBOOK TO REACH "WE THE PEOPLE"


PATRIOTS RECOGNIZE THE METAPHOR as to why the Media howls about the New Media and Trump using Twitter?

Read and understand this.

About 30 years ago the market was divided up to Manufacturers, Wholesalers and Retailers and Consumers.

Manufacturers never sold to the retailer Direct. They always wen through a wholesaler, the wholesaler sold to The Retailer who then sold to the Consumer.

At that time the Consumer only what the wholesaler and Retailer wanted you to get.

Then came Walmart and Home Depot and Sam's Club and Costco and Amazon and QVC and Late night Infomercials etc. Guess who howled and whined and complained? The Wholesaler and the Retailer!

Suddenly their control over what the Consumer bought was gone. They were being bypassed. So they sued and lobbied and bribed Politicians to block this new flow of product. It did not work. These new names are here despite the howlers and whiners.

NOW the Old Media is just the same way. They were the "Wholesalers of News" AP, Reuters, New York Times, ABC NBC, CBS etc..

They took the news and retailed it the smaller markets and those folks disseminated the News to the consumers. No Consumer heard anything except what these Wholesalers deemed to be NEWS.

The Socialists saw this as great way to control the News so they for the past 30+ years have worked on infiltrating these Organizations. What better way than to have the consumer believe their rhetoric than to spread through "Legacy News Media" to unsuspecting Consumers who have no other alternative sources. It worked for a while. They spent the time the money and the effort to infiltrate this space. in 2016 they thought they had it sewn up. Hillary would win and the pace of the drive towards Socialism would accelerate.

But they did not count on the Internet and Cable News and Blogs and On line Content....and Twitter and Facebook! This alternative media allowed for TRUTH and alternative points of FACT!. It exposed the Legacy Media's plans to Destroy America.

THEY HATE IT. THEY CONTROLLED THE NEWS BUT SUDDENLY THEY DO NOT!

Nov 9 2017, WE WON.. Donald Trump became President and they worked overtime to try and overturn the decision. It did not work. Then they used the Media to discredit and destroy Donald Trump. They denied him fair access to the Media. They lied and distorted the stories to fit their narrative. They were the Howlers and Whiners using the media they had bought to destroy the Conservative Agenda!..

So Donald Trump on Twitter like a "Nobody Manufacturer" on QVC or a Infomercial spoke directly to the people. The Middle man was cut out! This Middle Man.. the Media who had an agenda to Transform America was getting cut out of their Anti American Message.

See.. Trump Has To Tweet To Bypass A Dishonest Media Establishment that is the Trojan Horse.. the Anti American Cadre hiding within the exoskeleton of the Brand Name they had bought or Infiltrated.

Media Research Center found that 91% of the news about President Trump on the three major networks was negative to him. The Harvard Kennedy School’s Shorenstein Center found that during the presidential campaign, the major media outlets were negative towards Trump 77% of the time. The IBD/TIPP poll reported that 55% of Americans said they had less trust in the media as a result of the 2016 campaign coverage. Finally, the Media Research Center/You Gov Poll conducted on November 9th found that 70% of the responders did not feel the news media was honest and truthful.

Much has been said about the ‘Three Horsemen,’ united against Trump: the Media, Hollywood, and the Democratic Party. So I ask you this question, “If the Three Horsemen are against Trump, then who is defending him against this massive attack? Republicans? No, the only person that is defending Trump is Donald J. Trump himself.

And WE THE TRUMP PEOPLE GET OUR NEWS OUTSIDE OF THESE EXOSKELETON BRANDS! This pisses them off! Their agenda is off track.

With 30 Million Followers, Tweeting gives Donald Trump a platform outside of the Wholesale Retail News pipeline in which to respond and defend his actions and positions to the American people. Think back to Bush 43 and the attacks he went through just getting elected and even more so after the September 11 attack. The media pummeled him and he never responded. I think the best person to defend what you believe is you. Both Bush 41 and 43 rarely responded to media attacks and other onslaughts while they were president and they have been very restrained since they left office, unlike Bill Clinton and former President Obama.

Remember when a felony was committed by Rachel Maddow of MSNBC when she illegally released on her show President Trump’s tax return for 2005. The government has the responsibility under the law to keep tax returns confidential. Do you think that she was releasing it to prove that Trump was a good guy? Did she want to prove that Trump did pay $38 million dollars in federal income taxes? She is part of the Infiltrators.

Remember all the Leaks from FBI and CIA to the New York Times about General Flynn and Donald Trump? Those were felonies.. but the Infiltrators at these two organizations took it and ran with it because it could help remove Donald Trump.

Why remove Trump ? Because he stands in the way of 100 years of slow progress to FUNDAMENTALLY TRANSFORM America from what it was founded as to something the Socialists want it to be!

Fourth Estate is long gone. It is now the Fifth Column working behind the lines. Along with the Universities, The Federal Judiciary, The Entertainment Industry, The High Schools Teachers, the "Usurped States" like CA, NY, Il, WA etc that they have been able to Infiltrate and Turn into Socialist Mini Oligarchies.

Its a WAR Folks and the left is heavily invested to win. They will stop at nothing.. and DONALD TRUMP with the Support of WE THE PEOPLE stopped their march.

UNLESS WE FIGHT BACK LIKE OUR OWN PERSONAL LIVES ARE IN DANGER.. THIS WILL JUST BE A PIT STOP AND THEY WILL CONTINUE THE RELENTLESS MARCH TO A SOCIALIST OLIGARCHY.

Make no mistake this is the plan.

John Gaultier

Thursday, June 29, 2017

SINGLE PAYER SYSTEMS ARE THINLY DISGUISED PATHWAYS TO SOCIALISM.

CAVEAT EMPTOR... BUYER BEWARE.. DEMOCRATS ARE THE PARTY OF PLANNED SELECTIVE DEATH.
SINGLE PAYER SYSTEMS ARE THINLY DISGUISED PATHWAYS TO SOCIALISM.

UNDISPUTED FACT.

Death by queueing is the inevitable result of government control of healthcare spending.


Government run Healthcare WILL HAVE TO CREATE...dangerous wait lines. Yes, waiting in line for a Doctor who will accept your insurance... will Kill a lot of you. Here are the FACTS!

Having Insurance Coverage is Not the same as using your Insurance coverage to get TREATED when you need to.

More and More Doctors.. (yes the actual care givers not the slick guys in suits or the mildly assuring Hispanic woman on a Government created website pitching great prices and "Guaranteed Coverage" in an "Insurance Contract").. fear that there is going to be a lot of death of patients “by queueing.” If you are enamored with ObamaCare or any other form of government controlled healthcare — single payer, socialized medicine, universal health care, Medicaid, and Medicare — prepare yourself. IT DOES NOT WORK! PERIOD.. Unless you can wait for treatment. Wait like 2-3 Months for Treatment.

"A queue" is the British word for people waiting in line. Death by queueing means you wait so long for the medical care you need that the disease gets you before the doctor does. Sound farfetched?
Following are just three examples of government healthcare causing death by queueing. 

Here are some ways that death by queuing has occurred:
In 2014, newspaper headlines in 72-point font were describing American veterans dying while waiting for their requests for medical care to be processed. An internal audit titled “Review of alleged mismanagement at the [VA] Health Eligibility Center” was released in 2015. It confirmed the allegations reporting, “As many as 307,000 veterans may have died [within the U.S.] waiting for medical care.”
 

In 1998, a Canadian surgeon named Ciaran McNamee sued the Alberta Provincial government offering proof that Canadians were dying in their single payer healthcare system while waiting for desperately needed and approved surgical procedures. There were either too few nurses or doctors, or insufficient operating rooms to deliver lifesaving care in time.

On Nov. 23, 2016, an Illinois Department of Human Services report confirmed that 752 Illinois Medicaid enrollees died while waiting for approved medical care. The state of Illinois expanded its Medicaid program in May 2013, which translates to 18 avoidable deaths per month just in the Prairie state due to the Affordable Care Act. That is death by queueing number three — enemy action.


Who is the enemy? Why is this happening?

When the government decides where healthcare dollars go, they pay the bureaucracy (themselves) first. Health care services—both people and facilities — must make do with the leftovers. ObamaCare reduced Medicare reimbursements to doctors (and thereby cut medical services to enrollees) by $716 billion in order to expand the federal healthcare bureaucracy. They are the enemy within.

Medicaid is worse and more obvious. Expansion of the program produced millions who were newly covered persons along with a massive increase in the cost of benefit packages. To pay all those bureaucratic costs, payments to care providers had to be slashed.
In New Mexico following Medicaid expansion, the Medicaid program had a 2017 shortfall of $416 million. To balance the program budget, they cut reimbursements to Medicaid doctors by an average of five percent. That decrease was imposed on already low Medicaid payments to doctors. 

Thus in New Mexico, Illinois, and most likely each of the other 30 states that expanded Medicaid, the following unfolded. The federal government mandated “better” benefits to millions of newly insured persons and massively expanded the bureaucracy to verify and distribute those benefits. To pay all these new bureaucratic costs, money had to be taken away from care services.

While death by budget is also an accurate description, it is important to keep focus on who is being hurt — the patients — more than how. That is why we should call what is happening death by queueing: We the Patients are dying while standing and waiting in line.

Many analysts predicted these unfortunate consequences of the ill-conceived structure of ObamaCare. More people would demand care and would expect to get it. After all, the President Obama promised us, “all the care Americans deserve.” Meanwhile, there are fewer and fewer dollars to pay providers so there are fewer and fewer providers. More patients plus less doctors equals longer and longer wait times for care until you have death by queueing.

As long as a central authority called government has the power to allocate your healthcare spending, it will pay its bureaucracy before it pays for your medical needs. 

The U.S. has spent trillions of dollars for new healthcare bureaucrats and to implement millions of pages of rules and regulations. There is not enough money remaining to build Burn Units or operating rooms; pediatricians are paid less than the driver who delivers the Enfamil; and rural hospitals have to cut nursing staff in order to cover payroll.

Death by queueing is the inevitable result of government control of healthcare spending.

CAVEAT EMPTOR... BUYER BEWARE.. SINGLE PAYER SYSTEMS ARE THINLY DISGUISED PATHWAYS TO SOCIALISM.
ANYONE WHO ACTUALLY BELIEVES OBAMACARE WAS CREATED TO MAKE HEALTHCARE MORE AFFORDABLE.. BETTER LISTEN TO THIS SECRET RECORDING MADE OF OBAMA TELLING HIS CADRE THAT OBAMACARE IS JUST THE FIRST PHASE!...
THIS WAS THE PLAN ALL ALONG.... TO MAKE OBAMACARE FAIL.SO THEY CAN IMPLEMENT SINGLE PAYER..

REMEMBER:

Russian communist leader Vladimir Lenin, understood the role of medicine when he opined, “Medical care is the keystone in the arch of socialism.”

One of the first acts of the new Bolshevik government was to nationalize health care – again, not out of altruistic concern for the masses of Russian peasants, but to centralize control over the population and over physicians and decide who gets the care and who does not. The Government would be able to control the masses by controlling who stays healthy and who does not. A socially engineered form of Eugenics to populate the country with those who will toes the Communist line and do away with those who will not without having to resort to mass killings or starvation.
PRETTY SLICK EH ?